Welcome to BeerMoneyForum.com - BIGGEST MAKE MONEY FORUM ONLINE

[SlotsGator]

Progressive betting means adjusting your bet size using a certain formula. The most well-known progressive betting system is the Martingale system, which doubles your bet size every time you lose. Let's say on roulette you lose $1 on round 1, you then bet $2 on round 2 so that you'll get a $2 profit that will cover your previous $1 loss, plus $1 profit. After winning the round, you have to reset the base bet to $1 and start over. Because you increase the stake after losing, this system is called negative progression.

Conversely, there's the Paroli system. This is the exact opposite of Martingale system, therefore often called anti-Martingale or reverse Martingale. Let's say on roulette you win $1 on round 1, you then use the profit to bet $2 on round 2 so that you'll get a $2 profit (and +$1 previously). After losing the round, you have to reset the base bet to $1 and start over. Because you increase the stake after winning, this system is called positive progression.

And many more!

The question is which is more enjoyable? Or do you find progressive betting not suitable for you? And how often do you use it?

 

[Flower]

I would be sure to use the martingale method almost all the time because it is a safe strategy to use except if you lose games consecutively for multiple times. This is when it will become useless but it also depends on your budget and the number of split you are able to get.

 

[btaliat]

Though I don't use any of the following you listed. I play bet based on the money that I can afford at that time. But if I am to choose, I would have gone with Paroli system. Using martingale method seems as it one is chasing lost bets and there may still be more chance to lose.

 

[gammarays]

Martingale betting is very popular among people betting sports. It's very good when your predictions have a high rate of winning and odds is high. Aside that it's very risky because it can consume capital.

 

[btaliat]

Martingale betting is very popular among people betting sports. It's very good when your predictions have a high rate of winning and odds is high. Aside that it's very risky because it can consume capital.

That's the reason most people don't always use the method. It makes the risk high and as well makes the spending much on betting. It is only to be done if we are very sure of the next game if we have lost in the first game.

 

[gammarays]

That's the reason most people don't always use the method. It makes the risk high and as well makes the spending much on betting. It is only to be done if we are very sure of the next game if we have lost in the first game.

It's not a favourable betting system for me because of the risk as losing progress. Betting on high odds is risky too as you don't have any influence on the outcome. It's best to divide capital into parts and play with just a part each time.

 

[SlotsGator]

Martingale betting is very popular among people betting sports. It's very good when your predictions have a high rate of winning and odds is high. Aside that it's very risky because it can consume capital.

I think Paroli (reverse Martingale) is better if the % chance of winning is high since you'll most likely win consecutively. Also, the calculation is simpler since you only have to use the profit from the last play for the future play, like a parlay. While if you use Martingale, you have to calculate manually how much you need to raise your stake after a lost bet. In the case of 50:50, like on dice or roulette, it's easy, just double the bet, as for sports bet, the calculation is much more difficult.

 

[gammarays]

I think Paroli (reverse Martingale) is better if the % chance of winning is high since you'll most likely win consecutively. Also, the calculation is simpler since you only have to use the profit from the last play for the future play, like a parlay. While if you use Martingale, you have to calculate manually how much you need to raise your stake after a lost bet. In the case of 50:50, like on dice or roulette, it's easy, just double the bet, as for sports bet, the calculation is much more difficult.

I don't really know much about this but the method I prefer is dividing your capital by 10 and playing with one part. If you lose, the remaining balance is divided into another 10 and you stake one part till you win. This method saves capital.

 

[Flower]

I think Paroli (reverse Martingale) is better if the % chance of winning is high since you'll most likely win consecutively. Also, the calculation is simpler since you only have to use the profit from the last play for the future play, like a parlay. While if you use Martingale, you have to calculate manually how much you need to raise your stake after a lost bet. In the case of 50:50, like on dice or roulette, it's easy, just double the bet, as for sports bet, the calculation is much more difficult.

It is always better to adopt a strategy that will attach optimum risk management to your betting activities. I think arbitrage was incorporated into betting because it is a risk management procedure that will not allow you lose all your funds if it is properly followed.

 

[SlotsGator]

I don't really know much about this but the method I prefer is dividing your capital by 10 and playing with one part. If you lose, the remaining balance is divided into another 10 and you stake one part till you win. This method saves capital.

This is also a type of progressive betting where your bet size is varied according to your balance. Let's say your starting balance is $100, and your bet size is 1/10 = $10. If you lose the bet, your balance will be $90, and your bet size is 1/10 = $9.

Yes, this method saves capital and will enable you to play for quite a long time. However, when you are in a scenario where your balance is reduced by 50% or so, the game feels not quite enjoyable since you only make a $5 bet instead of a $10 bet. You don't feel the adrenaline, and if you win, the payout will be small as well. I think this is the reason the method that you mention isn't quite popular.

 

[gammarays]

This is also a type of progressive betting where your bet size is varied according to your balance. Let's say your starting balance is $100, and your bet size is 1/10 = $10. If you lose the bet, your balance will be $90, and your bet size is 1/10 = $9.

Yes, this method saves capital and will enable you to play for quite a long time. However, when you are in a scenario where your balance is reduced by 50% or so, the game feels not quite enjoyable since you only make a $5 bet instead of a $10 bet. You don't feel the adrenaline, and if you win, the payout will be small as well. I think this is the reason the method that you mention isn't quite popular.

Yes you just perfectly explained what I meant. That is the best system because you'll always have something to bet with. Anytime you win, you add everything back and go with 10% of it. It's good to work on picks too.

 

[Johnson2468]

Though I don't use any of these two strategies. I just bet once in a while and I do it randomly with the amount I can afford to lose. I think a prefer martingale system if I am to choose from these two because it helps to manage risk

 

[SlotsGator]

Though I don't use any of these two strategies. I just bet once in a while and I do it randomly with the amount I can afford to lose. I think a prefer martingale system if I am to choose from these two because it helps to manage risk

Martingale is riskier than betting randomly in my opinion because you need a certain amount in your bankroll to take x consecutive losses. Let's say you bet $1, and for martingale at least you need $32 to take five consecutive losses. Well, from my experience, five consecutive losses happened so often. Maybe I was just unlucky :) And remember there was the 1913 Monte Carlo incident that record the most consecutive losses 26 times. While if you had placed the anti-martingale strategy on that event, you would earn $33,5 million from a $1 bet.

The best-case scenario from martingale is when the result flips quite often between red and black without high consecutive losses.

 

[Mar20]

As an AI language model, I do not have the ability to engage in any form of gambling, including sports betting or casino gaming. I do not use progressive betting or any other betting strategies, as I am not capable of making bets or wagers.
Progressive betting is a type of betting strategy that involves increasing your bet size after a losing bet in an effort to recoup your losses and make a profit. While this strategy can be effective for some people, it can also be risky, as it involves increasing your bet size after a losing bet, which can lead to significant losses if the losing streak continues.
In general, it's important to approach any form of betting with caution and to be aware of the risks involved. Betting strategies can be helpful in some cases, but it's important to remember that the outcome of any bet is largely determined by chance and that there is no guarantee of winning. It's always best to practice responsible gambling and to set limits on your betting activities to minimize the risk of harm.

 

[Margery]

Progressive betting means adjusting your bet size using a certain formula. The most well-known progressive betting system is the Martingale system, which doubles your bet size every time you lose. Let's say on roulette you lose $1 on round 1, you then bet $2 on round 2 so that you'll get a $2 profit that will cover your previous $1 loss, plus $1 profit. After winning the round, you have to reset the base bet to $1 and start over. Because you increase the stake after losing, this system is called negative progression.

Conversely, there's the Paroli system. This is the exact opposite of Martingale system, therefore often called anti-Martingale or reverse Martingale. Let's say on roulette you win $1 on round 1, you then use the profit to bet $2 on round 2 so that you'll get a $2 profit (and +$1 previously). After losing the round, you have to reset the base bet to $1 and start over. Because you increase the stake after winning, this system is called positive progression.

And many more!

The question is which is more enjoyable? Or do you find progressive betting not suitable for you? And how often do you use it?

Progressive bets are used in online games to allow players to increase their winnings. They allow you to increase the stakes as the game goes on, which makes the game more interesting and exciting. Also progressive stakes can lead to bigger prizes for players who reach the highest stake and win.

 

[rush08]

Many people actually place bets based on the size of their income. Due to this people are indebted because they have staked games above their income and they have lived in debt leading them to frustration and wants.....

 

[Margery]

The size of the bet for a player in gambling depends on several factors, including the player's level of confidence in their decisions, the overall budget of the player, as well as the type of gambling. It is generally accepted that players should bet no more than 5-10% of their total budget on each game.

 

[rush08]

The size of the bet for a player in gambling depends on several factors, including the player's level of confidence in their decisions, the overall budget of the player, as well as the type of gambling. It is generally accepted that players should bet no more than 5-10% of their total budget on each game.

Most times people who are addicted to gambling never care to evaluate the risk they are taking when they are gambling. They fail to understand that they can loose all their money if they fail to understand the level of risk they are taking.....

 

[Sammydan]

Progressive betting is not common betting strategy but I think it'll be profitable. I have not tried it but I will definitely give it a trial. However, I think the strategy will have it's flaws. With progressive betting, you increase your stake per each game you'll play untill win, that you'll start over again. It's a possibility that you could lose 5 game in row.

 

[SlotsGator]

It's a possibility that you could lose 5 game in row.

Losing 5 games in a row (let's say with a 50% winning chance) is common, I think it's 3.13% if my math is correct, so not a big deal. In this kind of event, we can still use the martingale strategy since the next bet will only be 32x of your starting bet. And if you win, you'll get your money back from all previous losses. Things get complicated when you lose 10+ games in a row