Welcome to BeerMoneyForum.com - BIGGEST MAKE MONEY FORUM ONLINE

[AudraMiller]

One of the main things that managers have a problem with his whether to micromanage the staff or to oversee all of the operations that occur on a general basis. Each of them have their own advantages and disadvantages. For example if you micromanage you are able to pick up mistakes quickly and in this way you can rectify them. However doing socials a lack of confidence in your employees which could result in decreased motivation levels. On the other hand if you oversee the entire operation you may not realise that something is going wrong until it is too late. Which managing style do you think is the best?

 

[Niftyicon]

I think this depends on the size of your business and the staff strength. You can manage everything if your business is still small but delegate some parts to others as it increases in size.

 

[AudraMiller]

I think this depends on the size of your business and the staff strength. You can manage everything if your business is still small but delegate some parts to others as it increases in size.

This is an excellent point. I think that many try to manage all aspects despite teh size, and this over bearing nature can lead to demotivation in their employees and a lack of productivity as a result.

 

[Razor1911]

This is an excellent point. I think that many try to manage all aspects despite teh size, and this over bearing nature can lead to demotivation in their employees and a lack of productivity as a result.

Well some sort of micro management is not bad. But you sometimes have to monitor the business performance. If the performance is good, you don't have to indulge yourself in everything and if the performance is weakening then you must have to try the fault in your management.

 

[AudraMiller]

Well some sort of micro management is not bad. But you sometimes have to monitor the business performance. If the performance is good, you don't have to indulge yourself in everything and if the performance is weakening then you must have to try the fault in your management.

Yes. I think that to a large extent if there is a good profit that is being generated by a business then you have to be able to trust that your employees will be able to do well and make the right decisions. This trust will go a long way into developing a healthy business environment.

 

[Razor1911]

Yes. I think that to a large extent if there is a good profit that is being generated by a business then you have to be able to trust that your employees will be able to do well and make the right decisions. This trust will go a long way into developing a healthy business environment.

A business will only grow when team spirit is high. Every individual has thei own share of responsibility. If all do hard work you will definitely succeed. And from a Managerial perspective, i think manager should always focus on goal and outcome.

 

[AudraMiller]

A business will only grow when team spirit is high. Every individual has thei own share of responsibility. If all do hard work you will definitely succeed. And from a Managerial perspective, i think manager should always focus on goal and outcome.

I agree with you. After all the most important thing is meeting the goals that you set for a team or even exceeding them. However the methodology to reach those goals becomes very important if you are hoping to replicate it in other business sectors as well.

 

[Niftyicon]

This is an excellent point. I think that many try to manage all aspects despite teh size, and this over bearing nature can lead to demotivation in their employees and a lack of productivity as a result.

That would undoubtedly not help the employees and also very tiring for the business owner. As much as it may seem difficult to trust others to take care of one's business, it is impossible to handle everything alone in a big business or chain of businesses.

 

[Corzhens]

What I understand with micromanage is to monitor the details of the business. If you have the luxury of time then I guess you can do it. But when the business is growing maybe it is not practical to micromanage.

 

[Josemendez]

For a business with many sections , one will find it difficult managing the affairs of each section singlehandedly. He needs someone to help him succeed.

 

[ELSA-ELI]

When starting off it is best to start with overseeing all the operations of the businesss but you could be limited when the size of the company is huge like earlier started by the other commentors.That means as the manager you will have to pay extra attention to deal as they are explaining to you.

Bottom line is that you have to know what happens at each stage as if you were there as well then the business will excel.

 

[Mikesax]

It is better to micromanage as Manager because it will gives all the employees to display there strength in handling some cases in the office or work place.
And if its completely manage by the manager one may not be able to detect such workers.

 

[Dav1d]

Like they say, certain situations calls for certain kind of actions. Personally I feel it would be best to always check out the business yourself, no matter how good and trustworthy your employees might be, still find time to go through the business.

 

[ELSA-ELI]

Yes as much as you would want deliberation of some skills it is still essential that you remain the centre stage or link to most sections of your business.More especially if you are a start up to ensure funds are utilised properly at each section.

 

[a_jerobon]

I think micromanaging is the best option for me. This is because there are so many things that need to be managed in most companies. If you choose to oversee everything then you may end up having too much work.

 

[kaycee001]

It all depends on the business size and the services they render. You can oversee all operations if the business is very low and locating faults and fixing will also be quite easy but when the business is huge then one might not have any option than to put capable and and trusted staffs in some positions to help in managing the business.

 

[Wisdom01]

Micro manage the staff should be better , because you can easily see the capability of the staff operating ,if they decide to work for the company or not

 

[achawaskey]

I think micromanage is the best, in that way the company will be positioned for profit, and since those employed shows there quality before been employed.

 

[Wisdom01]

I think micromanage is the best, in that way the company will be positioned for profit, and since those employed shows there quality before been employed.

Exactly and it would even give you the opportunity to rate your staff and know the way or best possible means you would share their salary if you want to apportion it based on their work rate

 

[Mikesax]

I think this depends on the size of your business and the staff strength. You can manage everything if your business is still small but delegate some parts to others as it increases in size.

You are right. Its the size of the business that will determine may be you can manage it by your self alone or with someone.